Yay for Lucy Liu in Ugly Betty, and that Wilhemina bitch killed Christine's chance to make a dress for Sarah Jessica Parker. She doesn't deserve editor in chief for Mode, seriously did you see her rampage when she fired like half the employees.
Posts: 768 | Location: New York City | Registered: 03 January 2007
Originally posted by kimends: Next 3 Thursdays, actually. The next new episode is March 15th...which is kind of random because after that episode there's another hiatus.
You can't put a show on a month and a half hiatus, usually that would kill it. Lost went on hiatus for three months and crashed.
Yeah, but that was mostly because it switched to a different time.
Posts: 302 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 29 January 2007
All I can say is...RIGHT ON!!! I can't stand her either!
quote:
Originally posted by JONNYSBRO: Was anyone rooting for Meredith to die? LOL. I cannot stand her. Her voice grates on my nerves, her slutting it up drives me crazy and I hate how all the men think she is god's gift. Pompeo is a bit of a diva too. In the National Enquirer they said she screamed at camera crew person. She seems a bit snotty to me and stuck up. Apparently she and Dempsey want huge amounts of money to continue. Pompeo could overtake Haritay as the highest paid female on TV. I find her so overated. Am I the only one who finds her so overated? She is in all the press, magazine covers and people seem to crow about her. Also love how Men in Trees is growing. The main thing is it is not going down but growing and staying consistent. It is very close to ER this week which was great for the show. Even if ABC does not keep Trees post Grey's next season, it is wise for them to grow it so it can move elsewhere next season.
What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
Posts: 1462 | Location: NY | Registered: 19 September 2006
A 2.4/ 6 among adults 18-49 with less than 5 million viewers is BAD.
quote:
Originally posted by Gee: What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
Originally posted by JONNYSBRO: Was anyone rooting for Meredith to die? LOL. I cannot stand her. Her voice grates on my nerves, her slutting it up drives me crazy and I hate how all the men think she is god's gift. Pompeo is a bit of a diva too. In the National Enquirer they said she screamed at camera crew person. She seems a bit snotty to me and stuck up. Apparently she and Dempsey want huge amounts of money to continue. Pompeo could overtake Haritay as the highest paid female on TV. I find her so overated. Am I the only one who finds her so overated? She is in all the press, magazine covers and people seem to crow about her. Also love how Men in Trees is growing. The main thing is it is not going down but growing and staying consistent. It is very close to ER this week which was great for the show. Even if ABC does not keep Trees post Grey's next season, it is wise for them to grow it so it can move elsewhere next season.
I am going to start a letter campaign and ask that she remain dead for the rest of the season. She doesn't need to make another camera appearance, she should be the DEAD NARRATOR. Sandra Oh is a much better actress, and she would be a much better lead. But then if Sandra Oh becomes lead, we would hear the dead Meredith complaining about Cristina stealing her McDreamy.
Posts: 768 | Location: New York City | Registered: 03 January 2007
4 million viewers on a major network is awful, no matter how we try to spin it.
quote:
Originally posted by Gee: What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
Originally posted by Suzaku: Supernatural will be on repeat next two Thursdays. So it would not compete against the ending of the tragic death of Meredith and the conclusion of the OC.
Next 3 Thursdays, actually. The next new episode is March 15th...which is kind of random because after that episode there's another hiatus.
Oh...I thought it was going to be 2 new episodes. That's what I heard about SMALLVILLE, at least. Hmm.
Posts: 302 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 29 January 2007
Originally posted by thewbrocks67: Marc, I think your too hard on Supernatural. It had to go up against CSI and this huge stunt on Greys and this week is was actually up 350,000 viewers from last week (2.84 million to 3.19 million). 70% retention in Adults 18-49 isnt too shabby and 63% retention against the competition that it has is not as bad as it could be, as you sometimes state. It does need to get better but its #s against this huge Greys stunt are respectable.
I am a HUGE Supernatural fan. It is currently my favorite show on network television. But when I see that my fellow fans are starting to make up excuses and spinning the numbers the way Veronica Mars fans does, it makes me kind of sick. If the CW gives any hint that it is in danger of being canceled, which I don't think it is, then we should fight for it, but we need to accept what we have and be happy with what we get. Marc was appropiate in his anayysis. Smallville hit 5.3 million last night. If Supernatural at least had kept the demo then maybe it wouldn't have to be called a loser.
Posts: 1543 | Location: NY | Registered: 17 November 2006
I suppose when it falls to 3.6 million like the OC we can still blame the timeslot?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: 4 million viewers on a major network is awful, no matter how we try to spin it.
quote:
Originally posted by Gee: What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
I believe that this is it's lowest rating for a new episode since moving to Thrusday night.
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman: A 2.4/ 6 among adults 18-49 with less than 5 million viewers is BAD.
quote:
Originally posted by Gee: What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
Originally posted by Vic De Salvo: I believe that this is it's lowest rating for a new episode since moving to Thrusday night.
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman: A 2.4/ 6 among adults 18-49 with less than 5 million viewers is BAD.
quote:
Originally posted by Gee: What's so awful about 80% retention for a freshman 9:30 sitcom?
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj: But last night's numbers were truley awful. They haven't been that bad in a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Paul LeBel: Marc--you've been sharpening that ax for "30 Rock" for some time now...you keep it up and you're not gonna have an ax to grind on and they'll bring the show back. Just because of you.
We're an exclusive club...only special people can watch, and each week we whittle it down a little more, like "Idol" does with its contestants...
Originally posted by tallsy: Last night's Shark was really good. I'm glad it got over 15M viewers, although I'm sad to see the bodyguard go: he was both hot and a good actor. I liked him when he was on Entourage as well.
SHARK is the #1 new show of the season. Not UB or Heroes
