The repeat numbers for BBT and 2.5 Men are more of what I expected. Those fast national were WAYYY to high at first. Good numbers for basketball though

quote:

Originally posted by Justin:

quote:

I bet u money it wont get over 4 million viewers.

I'm almost 100% sure it will. It's airing on CBS. Virtually nothing on CBS debuts THAT badly. Now, if it were debuting on NBC, then probably.

It wont do good at all,

First of all it will be airing behind Big Brother and second of all it will be airing at 10pm.

No Reality show does good in the 10pm slot.

quote:

Originally posted by Walter:

quote:

Originally posted by Obveeus:

quote:

Originally posted by mushu_jj:
I don't see Secret Talents of the Stars doing any worse than Jericho in the demo.

Secret Talents of the Stars sounds like the old person's version of Dancing with the Stars. Big Brother will help boost the demo a bit, but this show still sounds lik an old person's magnet.

No the Shows gonna fail.

Well, that is what I was intending to impart.

quote:

I bet u money it wont get over 4 million viewers.

I'm not sure it will drop that low, but it stands a good chance of being CBS's worst show this week.

quote:

Originally posted by TravisYanan:

BACHELOR (10:02pm)                  4.8/8   2.5/6   6,826,000

ABC's in house bias is clearer than ever. This is a clear flop season and would be a good time to move to Wed. to create reality night. Then WMC could just as well air on Mondays.

Can barely watch tonight's Big Brother with the supposed "Christian" group in control. Zzzzzzzzz and if I watch anymore of Natalie, I may have to spend my tuition money, go to LA, and choke a b*tch myself!

Come join the fun and play the PI Feddback Challenge Daily Game.

Guess the Ratings for a different show each day. Just follow the instruction from the image link on the right.

American Idoal Gives Back is today's Daily Game featured program. How will viewers respond to 2.5 hours of AI? Give us your predictions on total viewers and 18-49 Demo.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: TV-aholic,

Nice ratings for the championship game. It was a really good one; I had Kansas picked to win it all and though for sure they would lose before the miracle 3 with 2.1 seconds left.

The repeat of Big Bang Theory had good ratings although that may have been affected by the championship game. I was hoping for new episodes of Big bang Theory and How I Met Your Mother before hand but oh well. Although I missed the first three seasons of HIMYM so I'm just curious if anyone can let me know if the show has gotten better since it started. I also have started to watch Two and a Half Men a little pretty late.

Another pisher battle on these boards? Why bother arguing with him? Everyone knows he's obsessed with seeing the failure of anything related to Firefly and Joss Whedon. And that includes that girl playing the Terminator. I check these boards on Mondays cause of Big Bang and HIMYM and I don't remember him starting anything because New Ansterdam was doing very badly in the ratings and couldn't be used to bash the Terminator show. Now that NA goes up he comes here to gloat. It's obvious what he's doing so why feed the troll as the expression goes.

quote:

Originally posted by TV-aholic:
With a new NCIS, it usually pulls close to a 4.0 in the demo, even going up against AI.

Actually the only new episode that aired this season against Idol was on Jan 15, and it got a 3.0 in the demo.

The last new episode before that was during November sweeps on the 27th and could only pull a 3.3

quote:

Originally posted by TV-aholic:
SToTS looks like a dog, but you never know with reality TV.

Sometimes you know. ;-)

quote:

Originally posted by PennNova:

Another pisher battle on these boards? Why bother arguing with him? Everyone knows he's obsessed with seeing the failure of anything related to Firefly and Joss Whedon. And that includes that girl playing the Terminator. I check these boards on Mondays cause of Big Bang and HIMYM and I don't remember him starting anything because New Ansterdam was doing very badly in the ratings and couldn't be used to bash the Terminator show. Now that NA goes up he comes here to gloat. It's obvious what he's doing so why feed the troll as the expression goes.

Excellent observation from your part since I noticed that too. I have to admit I was bored so I wanted to test the little troll. His replies were mediocre at best, predictable and boring so a complete waste of time since he couldn't entertain me. If you wanna make fun of people do it like a pro and do it for the money. He's just an amateur and he's not even good at it, that's the kicker!

I'll leave the little troll alone since he can't challenge me and I know he annoys the heck out of most of you folks here who are smart enough to see how pathetic some humans can be. That's why I'm glad to have a good head on my shoulders, imagine being him for the rest of your life

Bye pisher Give me a good sentence breakdown this time.

You know, LL, if you have lurked here a long time, I'd think you'd have noticed I only post here when I'm at work.

You thought you'd vanquished me or something?

quote:

Play nice, Pisher. I think anyone with that many posts should be applauded for keeping this website alive and well. So, my sincerest thanks!

Mine too. The need for good straight men can never be exaggerated.

Samantha who is one of those shows I just don't get why it has all this critical acclaim. It's not that funny, that is where I would imagine the audience went to -- to do something else more enjoyable. But Who's ratings are pretty good.

quote:

Originally posted by A.C.:
While SAMANTHA WHO's ratings aren't as strong as last time it was paired with DANCING I still think maybe it sould be HONRABLE MENTION.

Honestly I'm still ticked at the "fans" that abandoned the show after DANCING wrapped up last time.

And where did the fans go this time...I can't imagine DANCING's audience switching over to watch basketball on CBS?

Well, the good thing about Samantha Who? is that it's got Christina Applegate paired with Jean Smart. It's a great casting combination, but it really doesn't hold, especially when the show was moved to a timeslot where it didn't have the all-powerful Dancing lead-in. Without it Who? slipped to around 7 million viewers...I think?

quote:

Originally posted by filmkr27:
Samantha who is one of those shows I just don't get why it has all this critical acclaim. It's not that funny, that is where I would imagine the audience went to -- to do something else more enjoyable. But Who's ratings are pretty good.

quote:

Originally posted by A.C.:
While SAMANTHA WHO's ratings aren't as strong as last time it was paired with DANCING I still think maybe it sould be HONRABLE MENTION.

Honestly I'm still ticked at the "fans" that abandoned the show after DANCING wrapped up last time.

And where did the fans go this time...I can't imagine DANCING's audience switching over to watch basketball on CBS?

NCAA's - very good # particularly for a tourney that started in a sleepwalk but seemed to get a jumpstart with DAVIDSON vs KANSAS.

Since 2005 the final 4 has been rebounding from some decline in the early part of the decade.

MEDIUM - it's a sign of strength when a show can capitalize on a change in the hour on another net.

quote:

Well, the good thing about Samantha Who? is that it's got Christina Applegate paired with Jean Smart. It's a great casting combination, but it really doesn't hold, especially when the show was moved to a timeslot where it didn't have the all-powerful Dancing lead-in. Without it Who? slipped to around 7 million viewers...I think?

Exactly. I love the cast, I love the concept, I just don't love the execution and don't find it funny.