Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Marc Berman: 8 p.m. My Name is Earl (NBC) Viewers: 6.77 million (#3), A18-49: 2.6/ 9 (#2)
8:30 p.m. 30 Rock Viewers: 6.42 million (#3), A18-49: 2.8/ 8 (#2)
The positive news for 30 Rock, of course, was growth of 8 percent out of My Name is Earl. But, let’s be honest: this is no big hit. And it never will be.
It's still growth. And another sign of, what I have noted many times before, Earl starting to fail. (EDIT: Wait, what am I thinking, it was getting 13 million in its first season. More like nose diving) 30 Rock may have still been behind in viewers but the retention is getting higher and higher. Who knows what could have happened this time next season? And that's 30 Rock's highest rating since November. Hopefully the new timeslot next week wont hurt it
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pisher: [QUOTE]ES was a new show at first--its ratings have declined. The number of people interested in it has declined. It had bigger lead-ins, then smaller ones. So it has seemed to always get around that much retention, but if it was after Greys' for a whole season, it would be lucky to manage 40% by the end.
It's ratings have declined? Actually the Thursday broadcasts have been going up. Look it up. Its retention after new episodes has remained consistent. And then there is last night. After a repeat of Lost it saw it's audience increase 135%. Dude...check your numbers. quote: ABC would be betting tens of millions of dollars, you understand.
Yes, I have a master's degree in Math and am a high school math teacher. I think I understand numbers and money. That said, any show is a monetary gamble by ABC. All I am saying is that ABC should be patient. I know its a totally different genre and network, but X-Files was not a hit at first. Somehow Fox was patient, and it eventually turned into a break out hit. And speaking of Grey's. I remember it debuting to about 12 million viewers after Desperate Housewives. About what Brothers and Sisters gets consistenly. Eventually Grey's broke out into a huge hit. It happens sometimes....if networks are patient. . quote: PS: Greys still gets 20 million viewers?
And ES would be in the 4-5million viewer range, before the end of those 13 eps..
Based on what? quote: For the record, what you have just engaged in is known as a 'correlation'. Look it up.
I am well aware of what 'correlation' means. What you are is 'malapert'. Look it up.
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CaseyM: quote: Originally posted by the128boy: quote: Originally posted by TV-aholic: What ????? quote: Originally posted by RoyBoyCF: Apparently, if a large percentage of a show's audience is in the 18-49 demo, it's a hit. Which makes sense since it's young people writing and reading major media outlets.
The problem with the word "hit" is that it's totally vague, ambiguous, and subjective. To some it means giant viewer numbers, in relation to other shows on tv. To some it means that it gets good demo numbers vs. it's competition. To some it means having a mix of fairly strong ratings and a good amount of press buzz. To some it means critical acclaim. To some it means the amount of ad revenue the show gets. To some it is a mix of pop culture appeal, ratings, dvd sales, their personal opinion, etc, etc, etc, !!!! This was probably one of the biggest irks that i have had, was that when i joined this forum, i kept reading that The Office was not a hit. In my mind, i thought that a) the office brings in a lot of money for NBC, and can get better ad rates than most shows on tv, b)the demo numbers were very good vs. other shows, c) the word-of-mouth, critical acclaim, dvd sales, online viral presence, and press buzz were all very impressive. To me, this was MORE than enough to call The Office a hit, yet, to some, simply because of one factor, total viewership, they could not bring themselves to call the office a hit. The problem is that a "hit" means too many things to too many people. And unfortunately no one is really "right." You simply MUST define context before talking about a show's "hit" status or not.
Personally, a hit show is a show that is a combination the most elements you mentioned in your post (high viewers, high demo, ad rates, dvd sales, inernational succes, .... And for me "The Office" is a NOT hit compared to DH, Grey's, Lost, AI, ....
If we're talking about personal hits, then mine include Reaper, October Road, Ugly Betty, the Big Bang Theory, Family Guy, and Boston Legal and no one considers these shows hits yet Family Guy at times pulls very good demos and Ugly Betty pulls as many viewers as the Office.
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jamie: quote: Originally posted by Marc Berman: 8 p.m. My Name is Earl (NBC) Viewers: 6.77 million (#3), A18-49: 2.6/ 9 (#2)
8:30 p.m. 30 Rock Viewers: 6.42 million (#3), A18-49: 2.8/ 8 (#2)
The positive news for 30 Rock, of course, was growth of 8 percent out of My Name is Earl. But, let’s be honest: this is no big hit. And it never will be.
It's still growth. And another sign of, what I have noted many times before, Earl starting to fail. (EDIT: Wait, what am I thinking, it was getting 13 million in its first season. More like nose diving) 30 Rock may have still been behind in viewers but the retention is getting higher and higher. Who knows what could have happened this time next season? And that's 30 Rock's highest rating since November. Hopefully the new timeslot next week wont hurt it
I don't know if it is really growth if you want to call it that. Earl got a 9 share and 30 Rock got an 8 share. The only reason 30 Rock has a higher demo is simply because more 18-49 year old were watching TV at 8:30 than at 8:00. You can call it growth, but I call it lucky that more viewers were watching.
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Thrillcat: I LOVE Eli Stone!!! PLEASE ABC--- renew the show and give it another chance. I know all the bigwigs of ABC read this board
The chimps are reading? Perhaps they'd be willing to give me an all expenses paid internship to NYC to fix their network for them. Lets bring along TV-fan, TV-aholic, Bruce, and x while we're at it. We'll ship dumont out to Hollywood for some time with Cdub so they can at least go out in low rated fashion.
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: It's ratings have declined? Actually the Thursday broadcasts have been going up. Look it up. Its retention after new episodes has remained consistent. And then there is last night. After a repeat of Lost it saw it's audience increase 135%. Dude...check your numbers.
And yet the ratings expert who runs this forum disagrees. Why don't you ask him to check his?  quote: Yes, I have a master's degree in Math and am a high school math teacher.
It is SO sad you felt like you had to bring that up.  quote: I think I understand numbers and money. That said, any show is a monetary gamble by ABC. All I am saying is that ABC should be patient.
Right, like CBS was with Jericho. So have you got the SOS campaign in place, in case they see things differently? quote: I know its a totally different genre and network, but X-Files was not a hit at first.
No, but it performed much better than Eli Stone has, taking all relevant factors into account. quote: Somehow Fox was patient
Correction--FOX didn't need to be patient, because The X-Files was never a flop. It was a Friday night show with a relatively low budget, and it was bringing in good demo, and great buzz. That is not the case with ES. quote: And speaking of Grey's. I remember it debuting to about 12 million viewers after Desperate Housewives. About what Brothers and Sisters gets consistenly. Eventually Grey's broke out into a huge hit. It happens sometimes....if networks are patient.
It happens about one out of every twenty or thirty times networks are patient. But somehow it's only that one time that gets remembered by some people. quote: And ES would be in the 4-5million viewer range, before the end of those 13 eps..
Based on what?
What, you mean I can't just pull numbers out of my ass? Unfair!  quote: I am well aware of what 'correlation' means. What you are is 'malapert'. Look it up.
I accept the compliment. 
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: I LOVE Eli Stone!!!
PLEASE ABC--- renew the show and give it another chance.
I know all the bigwigs of ABC read this board
The wigs, maybe. The heads under them, not so much. 
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TV-aholic: quote: Originally posted by the128boy: Next week, WILL be the true test of wether the office can sustain these record-breaking-season-numbers.
 Lets have another one!
No fair. Starting before I'm out of class.... 
|
| |
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by RoyBoyCF: quote: Scrubs (Viewers: #3, 7.31 million; A18-49: #1, 3.7/10).
Certainly not a bad demo number. You were right to not label it as a loser.
Huh? Its lead in was a 4.9. It lost 1.2 in 30 minutes. Not good no matter how you try to spin this. Scrubs has never been and never ever will be a hit and ABC best come to their senses, have that creator write up a 2 hour movie finale and air it this summer on NBC.
|
| |
|
|
|
No love for me? Well then, I'll just make my trip over there myself.  quote: Originally posted by mushu_jj: quote: Originally posted by Thrillcat: I LOVE Eli Stone!!! PLEASE ABC--- renew the show and give it another chance. I know all the bigwigs of ABC read this board
The chimps are reading? Perhaps they'd be willing to give me an all expenses paid internship to NYC to fix their network for them. Lets bring along TV-fan, TV-aholic, Bruce, and x while we're at it. We'll ship dumont out to Hollywood for some time with Cdub so they can at least go out in low rated fashion.
|
| |
|
|
|
We'll let you go to Fox since you always claim to have the inside scoop there. :P quote: Originally posted by WlcmBlueBloodWorstEnemy: No love for me? Well then, I'll just make my trip over there myself.  quote: Originally posted by mushu_jj: quote: Originally posted by Thrillcat: I LOVE Eli Stone!!! PLEASE ABC--- renew the show and give it another chance. I know all the bigwigs of ABC read this board
The chimps are reading? Perhaps they'd be willing to give me an all expenses paid internship to NYC to fix their network for them. Lets bring along TV-fan, TV-aholic, Bruce, and x while we're at it. We'll ship dumont out to Hollywood for some time with Cdub so they can at least go out in low rated fashion.
|
| |
|

|
I'm on my way right now. Look for that renewal notice any day now for Eli Stone. I'm also going to make sure the unaired episodes of Caveman are shipped to Dumont's home. (The rest of the copies will be destroyed.) And I've saved the best news for last - look for ABC to resurrect GLo for the fall. quote: Originally posted by mushu_jj: The chimps are reading? Perhaps they'd be willing to give me an all expenses paid internship to NYC to fix their network for them. Lets bring along TV-fan, TV-aholic, Bruce, and x while we're at it. We'll ship dumont out to Hollywood for some time with Cdub so they can at least go out in low rated fashion.
|
| |
| Posts: 5958 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: 20 September 2006 |    |
|
|
|
But the real question is how to do solve the big J-I-M problem. quote: Originally posted by xwiseguyx: I'm on my way right now. Look for that renewal notice any day now for Eli Stone. I'm also going to make sure the unaired episodes of Caveman are shipped to Dumont's home. (The rest of the copies will be destroyed.) And I've saved the best news for last - look for ABC to resurrect GLo for the fall. quote: Originally posted by mushu_jj: The chimps are reading? Perhaps they'd be willing to give me an all expenses paid internship to NYC to fix their network for them. Lets bring along TV-fan, TV-aholic, Bruce, and x while we're at it. We'll ship dumont out to Hollywood for some time with Cdub so they can at least go out in low rated fashion.
|
| |
|

|
|
| |
| Posts: 1241 | Location: Brookline, MA | Registered: 25 September 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|