MEDIAWEEK WEB





Latest Headlines:
    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Thursday 10/09/08
Page 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Picture of Chimaera
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Zedman2:
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
quote:
Originally posted by Zedman2:
Obama to pay big for primetime buy

Barack Obama will pay CBS almost $1 million for its half-hour ad buy in primetime Wednesday, Oct. 29.

more at:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/new...6ab7fb73c509a16deaf3


Not that much actually


It is when you consider CBS would normally gross less than half of that amount for regular scheduled programming,


We're talking about the entire half-hour Z -- does CBS really not get $961 thousand for a half-hour's worth of ad time? Even for low-rated Wed at 8pm? I would think that they'd get about $150 thousand per 30 minute ad, which is a conservative estimate. At that rate, they'd get to $900 thousand after 3 minutes of ads. I think it's a good steal.
 
Posts: 75 | Registered: 05 May 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
Here are the trends of ES and Big Shots first 3 airings, after GA last year.

2007-08 Weekly Ratings Track for Big Shots

Weekly Rating Trends

Week                Viewers            Demo
----------------------------------------------
09/27/07            11.10 M            4.5
10/04/07             8.23 M            3.6 
10/11/07             8.54 M            3.6


---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------

Date                Viewers        18-49
--------------------------------------------
02/07/08            11.14 M         4.0
02/14/08             8.83 M         3.3
02/21/08             7.46 M         2.6




quote:
Originally posted by DonJ1973:
quote:
Originally posted by vlis:
didnt big shots and eli stone start out just as strong?
quote:
Life on Mars is doing great there, and it's the first regularly-scheduled show to have done that.


From what I remember from last season Big Shots hovered around 8-9M viewers and Eli Stone hovered around 7-8M viewers. Neither started out great and were already labeled disappointments. I think only Lost did well post-Grey's. I remember ABC actually moved Eli Stone to post Desperate Housewives to see if that would boost ratings and it did a little bit. Actually I was surprised Eli even got renewed.


===========================================================================



 
Posts: 21948 | Location: tvaholics.blogspot.com | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Picture of Marc Berman
Posted Hide Post
Scrubs was never a hit show...never. ANd it should have also ended three seasons ago.
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman:
This "trooper" has long outstayed its welcome
I hope your constant complaining works as well as it did against Scrubs: a show that announced a series finale date and lived on to another season after you constantly whined about how it needed to end. Keep up the good work! Wink


 
Posts: 11442 | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Here are the trends of ES and Big Shots first 3 airings, after GA last year.


You want to post one for "Shark" for two years ago out of CSI? "Without a Trace" isn't exactly a fair comparison to what ABC's been airing at 10PM. Wink
 
Posts: 151 | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
uh... you forgot High Rated. Cool
CSI:NY only drew about 10% more in the demo than ER and ER actually had competition. CSI:NY faces two complete failures.
 
Posts: 9799 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Picture of Marc Berman
Posted Hide Post
10:00 p.m. V: 12.55 m, A18-49: 3.7/ 9
10:30 p.m. V: 10.63 m, A18-49: 3.0/ 8

quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
Marc,

Can we have the half a hour break downs for The 11th Hour.

I want to see the drop.


 
Posts: 11442 | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post

Picture of Marc Berman
Posted Hide Post
10:00 p.m. V: 12.27 m, A18-49: 4.1/10
10:30 p.m. V: 10.93 m, A18-49: 3.5/10
quote:
Originally posted by yoda:
what were the ratings for life on mars from 10:00 to 10:30?


 
Posts: 11442 | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman:
10:00 p.m. V: 12.55 m, A18-49: 3.7/ 9
10:30 p.m. V: 10.63 m, A18-49: 3.0/ 8

quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
Marc,

Can we have the half a hour break downs for The 11th Hour.

I want to see the drop.


Thanks Marc,

Is that a bad drop?



 
Posts: 2063 | Location: Salem, Massachusetts | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by Zitrone:
And ER should be a 'winner' (!).
Just getting Marc to stop writing that it should have ended years ago to save its dignity is enough of a win.


ER was up over a million viewers from last week and was also #1 in the demo in its timeslot, against the premieres of two new shows, with much bigger lead-ins, and the show is 15 years old (and its been announce that this is the final season and it would have ended last season had their not been a strike). So I just dont get how ER doesnt even get an honorable mention... I understand that its way down from what it use to get, but I'd like to see any other serialized drama last for just as long and overall, do just as well.
 
Posts: 310 | Registered: 17 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman:
Scrubs was never a hit show...never. ANd it should have also ended three seasons ago
Yet your complaining single-handedly kept it alive for another year. Now, it has a good shot at being ABCs top rated comedy not using DwtS as a lead-in.
 
Posts: 9799 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pixley:
quote:
Here are the trends of ES and Big Shots first 3 airings, after GA last year.


You want to post one for "Shark" for two years ago out of CSI? "Without a Trace" isn't exactly a fair comparison to what ABC's been airing at 10PM. Wink

It looks like Marc removed the SHARK thrad from the forum Frowner

I don't have the Premiere week #s for Shark, but week #2 it drew 14.64 Million viewers.

Week #3 it drew 13.75 million viewers


===========================================================================



 
Posts: 21948 | Location: tvaholics.blogspot.com | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
Which one had a bigger drop?



 
Posts: 2063 | Location: Salem, Massachusetts | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
ES and BS had much bigger lead-ins, but still LoM didn't do all that great, and the half hour loss isn't encouraging at all
 
Posts: 4624 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
Which one had a bigger drop?


Pretty easy math, don't you think?
 
Posts: 4624 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
Which one had a bigger drop?


Pretty easy math, don't you think?


I know that!!! I am looking for my calculator right now.

Haha



 
Posts: 2063 | Location: Salem, Massachusetts | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16 
 

    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Thursday 10/09/08