No problem. I saw your question for Marc, and my opinion is most wont. Just look at the CBS comedies, they did better then before the strike. Some shows have been hurt; The CW shows.
Oh ya....
I Love The Big Bang theroy and Two and a half men.
I look foward to then every week.
The Big Bang theroy in my opinion is the best new comedy this season.
Agreed, TBBT is the best comedy this year. I also agree that Smallville's ratings arent what they used to be. Maybe that why there making a spin-off?
There making a spin off????????
I believe so. It probably will fail. The CW really needs to think smart and fast. Which will be a first.
haha
And they also order a pilot for a remake of 90210.
Thats really stupid.
I watched thats show as a kid.
they cant leave well enough alone anymore.
The only remake im excited for this comming season is knight rider.
Originally posted by vlis: so how do you explain Dateline? amnesia numbers are no better than grey's
quote:
Originally posted by Walter: The only reason 20/20 numbers are so bad is because Grey's Repeat Numbers stink realy bad.
I think Dateline did better because the episode was more interesting, but it was sad.
VOTE IN THE PIF NETWORK GAME: http://pifeedback.com/eve/foru...93910104/m/698106082 TONIGHT: ---> NEW <--- EPISODES OF MILLION DOLLAR GIVEAWAY, EDUCATING LEWIS, PLUS: $7.25 AN HOUR, BEING AVERAGE, OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, COLLEGE, BLACK TARMAC, AND DYNASTY!
Canterbury's Law so far: EP 1: 5.0HH/8%, 7.720m viewers, 1.7 A18-49 final EP 2: 3.6HH/6%, 5.710m viewers, 1.7 A18-49 final EP 3: 3.3HH/6%, 4.870m viewers, 1.2 A18-49 FAST National
Now seeing the full set of numbers, I echo my observation from the Thursday thread that Canterbury's Law did better than most probably expected for a series so hastily transplanted from Mondays at 8 pm to Fridays at 9 pm (not listed in paper-based tv guides), and retaining 94% of the Bones viewers and 86% of her young adult demo.
Mr. Reilly is a man of demonstrated patience when it comes to quality series trying to build an audience (Friday Night Lights, 30 Rock), and I have no reason to believe he is still not open-minded about the future of this moody, atmospheric legal meller.
Originally posted by no longer bored used to be striker: I love the new name "Welcome" very funny. If it wasn't for your 1600 plus post I never would have figured it out!
quote:
Originally posted by WlcmYourMmDtDance: Canturbury's Law is dead.
Also, is it just me or does anyone else think that Walter has back-end points in CANTERBURY'S LAW
Would NBC be better off flipping Amnesia and My Dad...? If Amnesia can get over 5 mill on a Friday, it can probably do better than My Dad's 4 mill on a Monday.
Also, why was SmackDown so low?
Posts: 59 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 05 May 2007
Well, IF (and we all know how FOX changes its mind alot), IF FOX goes forward with BONES on Friday nights next season, It companion show will have to be a leap of faith. No matter if its CL or NA, or a new show in development.
Will be aniteresting Upfront come Mid-may
quote:
Originally posted by spunky: Yay for Bones; it did quite well, considering most TV Guides were still showing Jezebel James in that timeslot, and Fox had little time to promote the scheduling change. Even a Bones repeat did better than the measly 3 million JJ had been averaging. Canterbury's Law on the other hand, scored lower ratings than repeats of House were getting, so that was a disappointment--especially since Fox had aired CL on Monday nights to give it some exposure. Bones/House make a better combo IMHO.
True, but the real blame goes to the habit of 'top posting' in the first place. The formerly Bored striker just amped that problem up a bit by posting above and below the quote.
I think that the 'back end' comment was a reference to the idea that your strong support for the mediocre performance of Canterberry's law could only be the result of you having some personal financial interest in the show's survival. I doubt it was meant seriously, although from time to time it does seem like people come here to prolifically post about 1 show in the hopes of getting other people to believe that it is worth watching/renewing. Reality is, there are not enough Nielsen families reading here to change the ratings by hyping a show to them and there are not any network honchos reading here that will renew a show just because they read some positive spin on these boards.
Originally posted by Obveeus: I think that the 'back end' comment was a reference to the idea that your strong support for the mediocre performance of Canterberry's law could only be the result of you having some personal financial interest in the show's survival. I doubt it was meant seriously, although from time to time it does seem like people come here to prolifically post about 1 show in the hopes of getting other people to believe that it is worth watching/renewing. Reality is, there are not enough Nielsen families reading here to change the ratings by hyping a show to them and there are not any network honchos reading here that will renew a show just because they read some positive spin on these boards.
