MEDIAWEEK WEB





Latest Headlines:
    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Sunday 1/20/08
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
quote:
And the Oscars are not that big



What? are you on something? the oscars are huge, of course the SB is way bigger, but you cant deny how well the oscars do yearly
 
Posts: 362 | Registered: 04 October 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Devilz_0:
quote:
And the Oscars are not that big



What? are you on something? the oscars are huge, of course the SB is way bigger, but you cant deny how well the oscars do yearly


Maybe you didn't read what i wrote, or maybe you're on something. I said "oscars are not that big". Where am i wrong? SB is twice as big (well actually more than twice)
 
Posts: 4624 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by yankeesrj12:
Life is Wild has gotten screwed all year from CW Now and Aliens in America repeats. I never watched it, but I bet it deserved a better time slot.


Just when you thought they couldn't show their blatant hatred enough, they go and schedule the season finale opposite the Super Bowl.

Make that reschedule, since they kept pushing the episodes back. I guess they needed to save them for those strategic opportunities when they're likely to get a, you know, zero share.


--
"Better Off Ted," Wednesdays at some time or another at some point or another in the near future. Because we can't all live in mansions and not ever work like the people on "Modern Family."
 
Posts: 1012 | Registered: 01 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
KSO
Posted Hide Post
WOW Fox.

The Oscars don't do that well. They do as well as American Idol last week.
 
Posts: 365 | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
CW: CW Now
Viewers: 521,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.2/ 0 (#5)
----------
CW: Aliens in America (R)
Viewers: 462,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.1/ 0 (#5)
Congrats to the CW for finding a show that can/will perform worse than CW NOW.


===========================================================================



 
Posts: 21948 | Location: tvaholics.blogspot.com | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of dumont
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
quote:
CW: CW Now
Viewers: 521,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.2/ 0 (#5)
----------
CW: Aliens in America (R)
Viewers: 462,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.1/ 0 (#5)
Congrats to the CW for finding a show that can/will perform worse than CW NOW.


The Aliens in America encore tied an all-time broadcast network low with MyNetworkTV in the A18-49 demo. To my knowledge, neither network has yet fallen to a 0.0 in the demo.
 
Posts: 6497 | Registered: 09 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of Douglas
Posted Hide Post
As we head for another Sweeps period this February, we look back at the November 2007 sweeps - as in, the final standings for the November 2007 Sweeps Game! They're online now so check 'em out!







TV ratings data for the Academy Awards since 1953 now online! Check them out now!
 
Posts: 7124 | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dumont:
The Aliens in America encore tied an all-time broadcast network low with MyNetworkTV in the A18-49 demo. To my knowledge, neither network has yet fallen to a 0.0 in the demo.


That is at least the 4th airing of that episode. Is it really logical/intelligent to pretend Aliens in America is doing worse that a new episode of CW Now?
 
Posts: 9799 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of dumont
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by dumont:
The Aliens in America encore tied an all-time broadcast network low with MyNetworkTV in the A18-49 demo. To my knowledge, neither network has yet fallen to a 0.0 in the demo.


That is at least the 4th airing of that episode. Is it really logical/intelligent to pretend Aliens in America is doing worse that a new episode of CW Now?


I was just stating the obvious that Aliens in America did indeed set a new record low for The CW. If it has been repeated too often, then that is a valuable lesson learned for The CW. MyNetworkTV hasn't gone so low as 0.1 in many months.

Isn't it interesting that over the past two months, while MyNetworkTV has been setting all sorts of network best evers ahd highpoints, it is The CW that is dechieving with its own string of network lowpoints?
 
Posts: 6497 | Registered: 09 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dumont:
Isn't it interesting that over the past two months, while MyNetworkTV has been setting all sorts of network best evers ahd highpoints, it is The CW that is dechieving with its own string of network lowpoints?


MNTV does have the advantage in not actually having any scripted programming, so they are 'immune' to the WGA strike. They are probably hoping that strike will last forever.
 
Posts: 9799 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
quote:
CW: CW Now
Viewers: 521,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.2/ 0 (#5)
----------
CW: Aliens in America (R)
Viewers: 462,000 (#5), A18-49: 0.1/ 0 (#5)
Congrats to the CW for finding a show that can/will perform worse than CW NOW.


Yet, the same number of people in the 18-49 demo show up week after week. Wink


Start Here

 
Posts: 4197 | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
quote:
Originally posted by Drew:
But it's better to get the next year, after the buzz, because the buzz happened within the year of Fox having the Super Bowl. So with the buzz, and with NY and NE playing, next year will make the SB even bigger because of what happened this year. And to say how could it get better? Well are you asking as a fan of the NFL, because I have been rooting for NE to lose, so I didn't want them in the SB, and I wanted to GB to win because I hate Eli. But asking the NFL, they love it, and so will NBC, because they have next year's SB.


Why would next year's SB would be bigger? I don't get it. NE has broken all the records, no matter what happens there won't be as much buzz
The ad rates for the Super Bowl are always rising. The Super Bowl is so big that it doesn't matter about the match up, its the event itself. BUZZ is pretty much the same each year.


===========================================================================



 
Posts: 21948 | Location: tvaholics.blogspot.com | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Go TAR!
Great finale, horrible ending, but hopefully there'll be a lot more TAR to come!
 
Posts: 40 | Registered: 20 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hawk-eye:
quote:
Originally posted by Drew:
But it's better to get the next year, after the buzz, because the buzz happened within the year of Fox having the Super Bowl. So with the buzz, and with NY and NE playing, next year will make the SB even bigger because of what happened this year. And to say how could it get better? Well are you asking as a fan of the NFL, because I have been rooting for NE to lose, so I didn't want them in the SB, and I wanted to GB to win because I hate Eli. But asking the NFL, they love it, and so will NBC, because they have next year's SB.


But the adertisers know that it will depend on the match-ups next year. If the Seahawks play the Bills in the Super Bowl next year look for more like 85 million viewers. (Still, huge because the NFL has done what the NBA and MLB don't, which is promote competative balance which leads to smaller markets still being able to draw high ratings). You are acting like the advertisers don't know and consider this already. This years buzz isn't going to make much of a difference next year when you are talking about the biggest buzz event TV to begin with.
Usually the Super Bowl is sold out way before the playoffs even begin, let alone when the SB matchups have been set.


===========================================================================



 
Posts: 21948 | Location: tvaholics.blogspot.com | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of dumont
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by dumont:
Isn't it interesting that over the past two months, while MyNetworkTV has been setting all sorts of network best evers ahd highpoints, it is The CW that is dechieving with its own string of network lowpoints?


MNTV does have the advantage in not actually having any scripted programming, so they are 'immune' to the WGA strike. They are probably hoping that strike will last forever.


Well, they do have about 40 hours each of unaired "Saints & Sinners" and "American Heiress" episodes that could be scheduled should the thirst for scripted programming become dire.

During the 2006-07, MyNetworkTV aired a substantial amount of original scripted fare (approximately 310 hours of scripted originals), which is more than The CW aired.

MyNetworkTV has both a sitcom and drama development project that are in abeyance due to the WGA strike. Until that dispute is settled, they are well-placed to compete with The CW using their growing number of well-rated reality series, strongly-rated specials and reliable theatrical movie franchises.
 
Posts: 6497 | Registered: 09 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
 

    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Sunday 1/20/08