Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Latest Headlines:
    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Wednesday 4/23/08
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
DVR penetration and the strike is really having an effect on most shows. For a show like LOST, it was already one of top shows in terms of DVR or Timeshift. I think the 10:00 pm slot will further increase the DVR usage and the timeshift numbers should even go higher. So, if LOST did 12 million, you know when add the 7-Day + LIVE numbers, you should get to 15 million easily.
 
Posts: 51 | Registered: 12 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
15 million isn't exactly stellar either. It'll never be as big as it was, but I do think they can get part of the way back, if they stop lollygagging around--and last night, it seemed like maybe they'd figured that out. We'll see if it lasts.
 
Posts: 5558 | Registered: 18 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of TV-aholic
Posted Hide Post
Thats always good the Dumont picks though.
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
If GA's 23% drop is confirmed in the fast nationals, that would mean 15.5 million.
Yikes! I guess I won't be winning that Daily game...and neither will ABC.


===========================================================================


 
Posts: 15679 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 20 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by The PI:
As for The Office, I watched it again last night and really enjoyed it. For more of my thoughts, listen to today’s PIPodcast at www.marcberman.tv.

Seems like Marc prefers the dark episodes. Eeker
 
Posts: 1807 | Registered: 08 May 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pisher:
quote:
Oooh, nice job of covering my point with a snappy comback.


Sorry this one wasn't so snappy, but I left work early. Wink

quote:
What else, ya got... lay it on me.


Just the truth, with snarks, like always. Big Grin

quote:
Seriously, trying to reason with you feels like arguing with a politician ;-)


Sheesh, what country do YOU live in? Wink

quote:
Who says? Are you the decider of how a show in it's 18th season is supposed to behave to be considered viable?


Well sure. Aren't we all? Roll Eyes

quote:
I actually disagree wholeheartedly with you.


You're accusing ME of sounding like a politician? Big Grin

quote:
Although some core fans remain, it's reasonable to assume that over such a long time, many many many of the original fans have become tired of the show for one reason or another (and not *all* of them based on quality). Yet, if the show is still viable, it can continue on.


Sure, and if a braindead patient stays plugged into a respirator, he can continue on. Very similar situation.

quote:
The key is to get NEW viewers. It's quite likely that there were viewers in it's 18-49 demo last night that WEREN'T EVEN BORN WHEN THE SHOW PREMIERED.


Well, let's see the youth demo numbers--it's not like we have to guess.

quote:
There are new viewers to be had for this show.


Okay. You do realize that applies to every other show on television, right?

quote:
A healthy lead-in could bring those viewers.


Okay. You do realize that applies to every other show on television, right?

quote:
This show could live on (if tended to correcctly) for years and years still.


Okay. You do realize--oh never mind. Big Grin

quote:
In fact, I think that it's STILL got more lasting power than the original CSI. This is all of course if NBC doesn't botch it up (which it probably will).


Yes, we all know how NBC has failed to nurture and protect the L&O franchise. Roll Eyes

quote:
But the fact is that L&O doesn't need to keep original cast members to stay relevant.


Particularly since it was never relevant in the first place. Just popular. Which it isn't anymore. Big Grin

quote:
This is a show that can continue with entirely new people. They just have to get new fans along the way.


But why would new people be more inclined to watch L&O than some other show they haven't watched before? Because they really dig that "DUM DUM!" sound effect at the beginning of every scene?

quote:
Not every show can do this (insert: ER)


And insert the same tired arguments you have just made, only coming from pissed off ER fans. Big Grin

quote:
One last observation...


Promises, promises......

quote:
if your idea of a brand name being able to survive on it's own without healthy promotion, Coca-Cola wouldv'e stopped advertising in about 1922.


And if your idea of running a network is to just keep running the same shows year after year, we'd still be watching Dragnet, and L&O would never have come into existence. And frankly, that would have suited me fine. Wink


... wow.
 
Posts: 207 | Registered: 26 March 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stingbee:
DVR penetration and the strike is really having an effect on most shows. For a show like LOST, it was already one of top shows in terms of DVR or Timeshift. I think the 10:00 pm slot will further increase the DVR usage and the timeshift numbers should even go higher. So, if LOST did 12 million, you know when add the 7-Day + LIVE numbers, you should get to 15 million easily.


Pisher, every show is down. So, be realistic. GA,CSI, American IDOL, and all the other shows are down from last year. You keep stating like LOST numbers in Dire Straits. Compare to the rest of the other shows and decline in viewership accross the board, it is acting pretty normal.
 
Posts: 51 | Registered: 12 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Series low for Supernatural in overnights. Very curious how much lower it will fall with final numbers.




 
Posts: 352 | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Maybe people forgot there would be a new episode of supernatural. The CW does not promote it much they only promote the stupid GG





 
Posts: 396 | Registered: 11 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mswood:
Series low for Supernatural in overnights. Very curious how much lower it will fall with final numbers.

Probably quite a bit, since there were preemptions. Last night's episode was unusual, and some people may have tuned out thinking Supernatural wasn't on, or just weren't interested in that particular concept, since it involved different characters and not the main ones.
 
Posts: 282 | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I find it really interesting that some SN fans are getting on Marc for labeling the show..."fading." As I mentioned earlier, it was not their strongest episode and out of the whole series, it was probably my least favoriate.

Peace!
 
Posts: 951 | Registered: 10 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
wenart25

I normally don't care for the humor episode. But I actually liked this one. Now my parents, they switched over to CSI, not due to content, but because they thought a different show was on.




 
Posts: 352 | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Pisher, every show is down. So, be realistic. GA,CSI, American IDOL, and all the other shows are down from last year. You keep stating like LOST numbers in Dire Straits. Compare to the rest of the other shows and decline in viewership accross the board, it is acting pretty normal.


Stingbee, which post of mine are you responding to--you quoted YOURSELF in this one. I'm saying NICE things about Lost this week. But it's a fact that its days of being a megahit are over.

Yes, it had good retention from Greys, but think about it--Greys is a horrible parody of what it once was (and it was never a great show, just an enjoyable one). It was facing tough (though also fading) competition from CSI. And Lost only got 76% as many viewers. At least part of its improvement came from being after the first new Greys in a while. And Lost costs more to make than Greys, you better believe it. Greys will still be on after Lost concludes--I won't be watching it, but I'm not watching much of anything on the nets these days.

I am really enjoying Lost lately, and I'm hoping to continue enjoying it. But don't ask me to LIE about its ratings, okay? I stopped drinking kool-aid a long time ago.

Wink
 
Posts: 5558 | Registered: 18 October 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  
 

    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Wednesday 4/23/08