MEDIAWEEK WEB





Latest Headlines:
    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Tuesday 5/08/07
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
Marc, no winner or honorable mention for Dancing With the Stars? Its gotten nearly identical numbers on prior Tuesdays, and achieved winner status... Wink

Wow... that's low for SVU. That has to be the closest Boston Legal has gotten to an original episode of SVU (in viewers).
 
Posts: 351 | Registered: 31 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Did AI run over last night? That would explain the equal demo with house. I guess we will see when the final numbers come out.


It went over by 1 minute. House started at exactly 9:01 according to my cable box.
 
Posts: 371 | Registered: 19 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of starbase135
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hunter:
quote:
The CW’s waiting-to-be axed Veronica Mars (Viewers: #5, 1.88 million; A18-49: #5, 0.9/ 2).


Under 2 million! That's beyond sad. And there pretty much goes my last hope that Veronica Mars will continue (at least in its present form).


You're right. At this point the new form is VM's only shot to come back. Even though it wouldn't be VM anymore...new title, new cast, new location and new time...it would be a new show along with those others The CW will launch this September.
 
Posts: 373 | Registered: 29 September 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of cann
Posted Hide Post
LA preemption couldn't hurt too much as Gilmore Girls has about the same ratings as last week?
 
Posts: 60 | Registered: 07 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Is there any chance the CW would disregard these numbers because of the pre-emption? Their upfronts are in a week, and I'm sure this was decision-making time with regards to VM. Is it possible this pre-emption may save VM because the CW will latch onto the LA excuse, even though it's pretty much guaranteed that the ratings would've been godawful even if the episode had aired in LA?
 
Posts: 374 | Registered: 02 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
The viewers were barely there to begin with.

Please observe while people who once said VM had to stay above 3mil viewers and 2.0 18-49 to survive scramble for rationalizations as to why a broadcast network show that just had a first-run episode led-in by the penultimate ep of Gilmore Girls garner LESS than 2mil total viewers, and UNDER 1.0 in the 18-49 demo should be renewed.

And believe me, they'll find ways to do it.

But nobody's paying them to do it.

CW suits--you don't have that excuse.

Wink
 
Posts: 7979 | Registered: 18 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Hey Marc, you forgot to label Dancing as a winner last night. Boston Legal was hilarious last night, definitely one of the funniest of the season.
 
Posts: 319 | Registered: 21 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Is there any chance the CW would disregard these numbers because of the pre-emption?


You mean disregard that GG's ratings went up, while VM's went down?

I suppose anything's possible with CW.

Wink
 
Posts: 7979 | Registered: 18 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by StephNC:
quote:
Did AI run over last night? That would explain the equal demo with house. I guess we will see when the final numbers come out.


It went over by 1 minute. House started at exactly 9:01 according to my cable box.


Thanks. How much of a difference (if any) does one minute make?
 
Posts: 1289 | Registered: 06 November 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Is there any chance the CW would disregard these numbers because of the pre-emption?



They could and probably will. They would have had a stronger case if Gilmore Girls had been hurt as badly, but it only lost 40-50,000 viewers.
 
Posts: 371 | Registered: 19 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of mrpotato531
Posted Hide Post
Wow...no matter how well the pitch was last week fo the new VM, this show needs to axed...and QUICK!!!

1.88 million is just completely unacceptable.. Even "Runaway" had numbers just above this (and lower than this for its final episode) and it was yanked immediately.
 
Posts: 790 | Registered: 09 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by starbase135:
quote:
Originally posted by Hunter:
quote:
The CW’s waiting-to-be axed Veronica Mars (Viewers: #5, 1.88 million; A18-49: #5, 0.9/ 2).


Under 2 million! That's beyond sad. And there pretty much goes my last hope that Veronica Mars will continue (at least in its present form).


You're right. At this point the new form is VM's only shot to come back. Even though it wouldn't be VM anymore...new title, new cast, new location and new time...it would be a new show along with those others The CW will launch this September.


I think the CW will bring back VM "The FBI Years" for the fall as a limited series. Give it a 13 episode run to see "what if"... version 1.0 is done and gone.....
 
Posts: 545 | Registered: 19 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
You're right. At this point the new form is VM's only shot to come back. Even though it wouldn't be VM anymore...new title, new cast, new location and new time...


The time is irrelevant, but you're right--that wouldn't really be a renewal at all. Just a desperate attempt to pad the syndication package of an old show, while trying out a new one. And it wouldn't work, but hey--this is CW. Nothing ever works.

Wink
 
Posts: 7979 | Registered: 18 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of mrpotato531
Posted Hide Post
One market - no matter how big - is absolutely no excuse for 1.88 million viewers.

I'm sorry, this show is done now. Regardless of how many spaces are on the CW lineup next year, this show does not deserve one anymore.

quote:
Originally posted by meggie:
Is there any chance the CW would disregard these numbers because of the pre-emption? Their upfronts are in a week, and I'm sure this was decision-making time with regards to VM. Is it possible this pre-emption may save VM because the CW will latch onto the LA excuse, even though it's pretty much guaranteed that the ratings would've been godawful even if the episode had aired in LA?
 
Posts: 790 | Registered: 09 October 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of College Basketball Fan
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tv avenger:
Hey Marc, you forgot to label Dancing as a winner last night. Boston Legal was hilarious last night, definitely one of the funniest of the season.


The opening had me doubled over laughing! Very funny episode (penned by David E. Kelley). He should write every episode. While he normally does a great job of presenting both sides of an issue, last night was very one-sided. I still loved the episode, but I can see how it could turn off some right-leaning viewers. Excellent hour of television. Perfect mix of drama and comedy.
 
Posts: 342 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 10 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17 
 

    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Tuesday 5/08/07