Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Latest Headlines:
    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Tuesday 4/29/08
Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Overall: Great news for Boston Legal. Sad to see the continuous struggle for Til Death and modest to solid overall CBS and NBC. Farmer Wants a Wife shows more promise than recent CW reality premieres.


Great news for BL? Why? As usual it's hard to know with these overnights but given the fact that WMC got (with DWTS's overrun) a 5.7 this number would mean around 7 million. And we know it skewes old so the demo will be around 2.
So where is the good news?
 
Posts: 3650 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by Twins12:
Don't you think 8:00 Wednesdays is a good spot for CBS to open up a new hour of sitcoms next season ? I think they could do well against the other networks, and do better than anything CBS has put on in that hour this season.
I agree that is a prime location for CBS to branch out with their 'glut' of sitcom offerings. The sitcoms would have to do as well as Kid Nation, Big Brother, and Price is Right in the ratings AND the sitcoms would have some potential to reach syndication where their is some aftermarket income.


I agree. The big question is which ones to move. I am not so sure that Old Christine and/or Rules of Engagement could actually survive without the Two and Half Men lead in.
 
Posts: 1076 | Registered: 24 October 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
quote:
Overall: Great news for Boston Legal. Sad to see the continuous struggle for Til Death and modest to solid overall CBS and NBC. Farmer Wants a Wife shows more promise than recent CW reality premieres.


Great news for BL? Why? As usual it's hard to know with these overnights but given the fact that WMC got (with DWTS's overrun) a 5.7 this number would mean around 7 million. And we know it skewes old so the demo will be around 2.
So where is the good news?


Hmm maybe the fact that it will likely do almost as good as WMC with half to less than half the lead in and it grew out of the lead in by 27%. When BL was pulling in 4s in the overnights, it was in 7 million viewer range. I expect it to hit 8 million viewers and anything above a 2.0 in the demo will mean it at least held the lead in.



 
Posts: 13341 | Registered: 23 September 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj:
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
quote:
Overall: Great news for Boston Legal. Sad to see the continuous struggle for Til Death and modest to solid overall CBS and NBC. Farmer Wants a Wife shows more promise than recent CW reality premieres.


Great news for BL? Why? As usual it's hard to know with these overnights but given the fact that WMC got (with DWTS's overrun) a 5.7 this number would mean around 7 million. And we know it skewes old so the demo will be around 2.
So where is the good news?


Hmm maybe the fact that it will likely do almost as good as WMC with half to less than half the lead in and it grew out of the lead in by 27%. When BL was pulling in 4s in the overnights, it was in 7 million viewer range. I expect it to hit 8 million viewers and anything above a 2.0 in the demo will mean it at least held the lead in.


Firstly WMC is a rookie show, BL it's not. It should do good on its own without any lead-in
Secondly i wasn't making a WMC-BL comparison, i was using WMC to see what kind of numbers BL did last night. And 7.5 million with a 2 in demos is not good enough for a show that it's on the bubble. Maybe the fast nationals will look better for BL
Anyway i still think BL, WMC and ES should come back next season as a friday block. If CBS brings back Moonlight next year this kind of line-up from ABC will be competitive with CBS's
 
Posts: 3650 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Just by comparing it to previous weeks, BL is prob around 7.5-8 mil and 1.8-2.2 in the demo. Sigh.
 
Posts: 284 | Registered: 10 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Twins12:
I agree. The big question is which ones to move. I am not so sure that Old Christine and/or Rules of Engagement could actually survive without the Two and Half Men lead in.
HIMYM is the strongest of the sitcoms (aside from anchor 2&1/2Men) so it will likely move to a new night as the comedy anchor. The other sitcom may come from the batch of freshmen coming in or it may be Rules of Engagement. I think that The New Adventures of Old Christine isn't compatible enough (or strong enough) to pair with HIMYM.
 
Posts: 8071 | Registered: 16 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Marc Berman:
I can ban people, and I have in the past, but this forum is for all types of opinions. JUst try to be nice, okay Walter? Razzer
quote:
Originally posted by Pam:
Is there anyway we can ban Walter from this forum ?
I'm all for freedom expressing opnions and I too am guilty of getting paranoid at times but this guy has taken being rude to an all new level .
I understand he hates Moonlight and have no issues with that but his posts are always arguementive and disrespectful.


I am being nice what did i say was mean this time.

I"ve been working hard on it!!!!!
 
Posts: 956 | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mredman:
quote:
Originally posted by Pam:
Is there anyway we can ban Walter from this forum ?
I'm all for freedom expressing opnions and I too am guilty of getting paranoid at times but this guy has taken being rude to an all new level .
I understand he hates Moonlight and have no issues with that but his posts are always arguementive and disrespectful.

I agree he has really become obnoxious. and keeps on with the oneliners if he wants to attack a show and person who likes that show
And this really proves it:

Be careful Mredman might attack you. Wink


Walter

Be nice and say sorry. Because i have seen several times that you are exactly the same way if you likes a show


I remember my friend Phiser saying stuff like that.

You guys need to stop.

I am fine today.
 
Posts: 956 | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
How old are you Walter? Bring some light to this mystery


I'm 14,
 
Posts: 956 | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
Do you really think we'll get the correct answer? People lie all the time, on the internet, about what they look like and their age.
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
How old are you Walter? Bring some light to this mystery


I'm not lieing i was Born July 22, 1993.
 
Posts: 956 | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Walter
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
Do you really think we'll get the correct answer? People lie all the time, on the internet, about what they look like and their age.
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
How old are you Walter? Bring some light to this mystery


I'm not lieing i was Born July 22, 1993.


And the reason im talk when i should be i school is I've been sick for 2 weeks.

So did i bring light.
 
Posts: 956 | Registered: 06 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Walter:
quote:
Originally posted by robert:
How old are you Walter? Bring some light to this mystery


I'm 14,


Thanks for the answer.
 
Posts: 3650 | Registered: 11 November 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Native NYer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wenart25:
quote:
Originally posted by Native NYer:
quote:
Originally posted by wenart25:
quote:
Originally posted by Obveeus:
quote:
Originally posted by Zitrone:
But you are basing all this on a couple of weeks for A18-49, and just after the CW spent more on the mid-season return of GG than it ever did for Reaper.
You keep complaining about how much money was spent on GG (I'm still waiting for anyone to give a number on that. I didn't see one off-network ad, so everything I saw was media generated 'free' advertising due to the 'controversy'). In any case, the money has been spent. It makes no sense to claim that CW should ignore the superior ratings becasue they 'bought them'. When it comes time for renewing shows for next year, how much was spent last year is almost irrelevant. All that matters is what viewer/demo/advertising income is projected for next year.


I have actually seen ads for GG on other networks; ABC, MTV, and the N network. So, they are showing them off network.

Peace!


Since Viacom owns MTV and The N and has a 50% stake in The CW, there was most likely some sort of co-op promotion deal at work there. I can't imagine that ABC ran promos for The CW, unless it was ABC Family--the cable arm of ABC. And even then it would not have had any 'geography' in the spots, not even Monday night. Something like "Check local listings".


No it was not on the ABC family channel. Here in New Mexico, the locals channels come from El Paso, so they show promos from ANTM, FNS, SV, OTH, GG, and Reaper. They have not aired ones for SN, EHC, AIA, and the other shows. Most of them are aired during daytime, but they still are being aired. And sometimes they air Check Your Local Listings or the day and time the shows are airing have been mentioned.

Ok...so when they advertise a show for the CW on a local affiliate, marketing/promotional money is not used, correct? Ok, that is interesting to know.

Peace!!

OK, that helps a lot. So, the ABC affiliate is promoting its CW duopoly's prime time programming during its local (daytime) promo avails. Most likely Early Fringe, rather than during the soaps...?

Regardless of when it's being done, no hard cash is changing hands. No actual money is being spent.
 
Posts: 82 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: 25 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Native NYer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
quote:
Originally posted by Native NYer:
Even with a duopoly, I'd be shocked, I tell you, SHOCKED if the ABC affiliate promoted a prime time show on The CW against its own prime time. It's just not done in Promoland. At best, there would be cross promotion for local programming, but not for prime. ABC still pays its affiliates network compensation. The CW doesn't. And if ABC found out that they were using their airtime to promote competing prime time programming, they'd make adjustments to the comp. Depending on market size,the comp can be the difference between profitability and not.
I see it here with our two major duopolies. LIN Broadcasting owns the CBS and MyTV affiliates and Tribune has the CW and FOX affiliates.

You don't see a lot of them, but you will occationally see a cross promo

Not sure what the Network can do to limit local ad time. I remember back a few olympics when COKE had an exclusive deal to be the only soft drink sponsor for the Network broadcasts. Pepsi went out and bought ad time with the local stations to air their commercial during olympic coverage.

The Coke vs. Pepsi situation is something that would have to be handled by the IOC/USOC. It's considered ambush marketing and is frowned upon (wink, wink) and is not up to the networks/stations to enforce. The local NBC stations are not--I don't think--bound by the same agreements as the network is. I'm not sure about that, though.
 
Posts: 82 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: 25 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Native NYer
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj:
quote:
Originally posted by Native NYer:
quote:
Originally posted by tvratingsjunkie:
quote:
Originally posted by TV-aholic:
quote:
Originally posted by Native NYer:
Since Viacom owns MTV and The N and has a 50% stake in The CW, there was most likely some sort of co-op promotion deal at work there. I can't imagine that ABC ran promos for The CW, unless it was ABC Family--the cable arm of ABC. And even then it would not have had any 'geography' in the spots, not even Monday night. Something like "Check local listings".
Just a reminder that Viacom spun off CBS and it is CBS that has the 50% stake in The CW, Not Viacom.

I wonder if the GG spot was a local spot that was on an ABC affiliate, which may also own the local CW affiliate.



I know my CW affiliate here in Michigan is owned by our ABC affiliate. CW61


Even with a duopoly, I'd be shocked, I tell you, SHOCKED if the ABC affiliate promoted a prime time show on The CW against its own prime time. It's just not done in Promoland. At best, there would be cross promotion for local programming, but not for prime. ABC still pays its affiliates network compensation. The CW doesn't. And if ABC found out that they were using their airtime to promote competing prime time programming, they'd make adjustments to the comp. Depending on market size,the comp can be the difference between profitability and not.


Here the CW is a digital sub of the NBC affiliate. Cdub ads air throughout the day for what's airing that night on the CW sub and what is coming up in recent weeks. Its usually 100% for the primetime stuff with the daytime fair mainly getting promoted on the network itself. I can't recall seeing CW stuff during primetime but most certainly during local news.


I think (again, because I'm not 100% sure) that in some markets, NBC shares local news production and broadcast with the local CW affiliate because the CW station is simply too small to have their own stand-alone news operation. It's not a true duopoly, but a way of amortizing expenses across multiple outlets.

I don't know if this is truly the situation in your market, though.
 
Posts: 82 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: 25 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14  
 

    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Ratings Box  Hop To Forums  Last Night's Results    Tuesday 4/29/08