Originally posted by pisher:
quote:
If 5 years and 10 cycles isn't a sign of endurance, then please enlighten me and tell me what is...
5 years and 10 cycles of programming people actually watched?
If you mean Ostroff, yes, she's shown tons of endurance. She's survived the end of one network, and is well on her way to destroying another one. And we know why she's not fired--her loyalty to Les Moonves, and his loyalty to her. Admirable. But ultimately not helpful, to anyone but Ostroff herself.
quote:
No disrespect to you, and I mean that,
And no disrespect to you, whoever you are. I don't know why you feel like defending the indefensible, but I appreciate your willingness to do so by prating meaningless factoids as if they mean something. And I mean that.
quote:
but your post just seems like another typical attempt at bashing the CW, which seems to be the norm in these boards.
Right. Only here. Nowhere else. There have not been numerous articles in the trades about CW's dismal failure. There have not been public speculations as to how long Ostroff can last, or how long CW itself can remain viable. And CW isn't posting lower ratings than UPN did, back before Ostroff rendered it unviable. Not at all. Perish the thought.