Originally posted by Jay:
quote:
Originally posted by mushu_jj:
quote:
Originally posted by Jay:
I'm not sure why people keep saying this. NBC, like any other company, wants to make money. Renewing a long-running series (that the network is no longer making a large profit off of - at least not original episodes) just to have a "proper sendoff" doesn't make good business sense.
Television history is filled with instances of series not getting a proper sendoff after years of service to their network - "Jeffersons" and "Soap" spring immediately to mind. So why should "L&O" be given anymore episodes to wrap up?
Because Law and Order still has a lot of historic fans who will catch wind of this ill treatment and a network with bad press already doesn't need anymore bad press. If I recall, the CW's Runaway was all but dead before its premiere thanks to the backlash of cancelling Everwood.
Point taken, but seriously, is NBC going to pour money into a series just to keep from making a particular group of viewers angry at them?
Everytime a network cancels a series, especially a long-running one, it faces the risk of alienating or upsetting those fans. If NBC does indeed renew "L&O" is won't be to keep an increasingly shrinking number of fans happy. That is not the way to run a network - even a network run the way NBC currently is.
Besides, are these "historic" viewers who have watched a 15-year-old series really the viewing demographic that NBC (and every other broadcast net) wants desperately to attract? How many younger viewers even watch this series - a series that started when many hadn't even started school yet?