|
|
Its a goner. Rappaport already has a new gig for next year.
|
| |
|
|
|
"Stacked" was not a bad show. At least it was not a bad show if one were to take a time machine back to 1986. "The War at Home" is a bad show regardless of what decade it looks like it came from. Sure, it's over, but did it really deserve 2 full seasons before that happened? I like the producers of Rapaport's new gig. I've even chatted with them in email. But, please, guys. Recast. Pronto. If "The Bore at Home" did any good on this green earth, it was to let casting agents know Michael Rapaport has no business being in a sitcom.
--
pearl clutcher-free since 2008
|
| |
|
|
|
Gotta agree with Riff on this one. quote: Originally posted by Riff Rafferty:
"Stacked" was not a bad show. At least it was not a bad show if one were to take a time machine back to 1986.
"The War at Home" is a bad show regardless of what decade it looks like it came from. Sure, it's over, but did it really deserve 2 full seasons before that happened?
I like the producers of Rapaport's new gig. I've even chatted with them in email. But, please, guys. Recast. Pronto. If "The Bore at Home" did any good on this green earth, it was to let casting agents know Michael Rapaport has no business being in a sitcom.
|
| |
|
|
He was good on Boston Public though... so perhaps he should be looking for another David Kelley venture. quote: Originally posted by Riff Rafferty:
"Stacked" was not a bad show. At least it was not a bad show if one were to take a time machine back to 1986.
"The War at Home" is a bad show regardless of what decade it looks like it came from. Sure, it's over, but did it really deserve 2 full seasons before that happened?
I like the producers of Rapaport's new gig. I've even chatted with them in email. But, please, guys. Recast. Pronto. If "The Bore at Home" did any good on this green earth, it was to let casting agents know Michael Rapaport has no business being in a sitcom.
|
| |
| Posts: 5542 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: 20 September 2006 |  |
|
